Mentionsy
Beyond Ideology: Inside Hungary’s Illiberal Pragmatism I Andrea Pető, Michał Kozłowski
In this episode, philosopher and sociologist Michał Kozłowski speaks with Professor Andrea Pető, one of the leading scholars of gender, memory politics, and illiberalism, to explore contemporary Hungary as a political laboratory of the 21st century.
The conversation offers a deep analysis of Viktor Orbán’s regime, understood not as a coherent ideological project, but as a system driven by what Pető calls illiberal pragmatism. Rather than producing stable values, this model operates through flexibility, opportunism, and strategic adaptation to shifting political and economic conditions.
A central concept discussed is the “polypore state”—a parasitic structure that feeds on external resources, particularly those of the European Union, while redistributing them to sustain a loyal political elite. This framework reveals how power can be maintained without ideological consistency, relying instead on control over institutions, narratives, and material flows.
The episode also addresses the paradox of women’s support for the regime, initially mobilized through the promise of “emancipation within the home” and the symbolic valorization of motherhood. Today, however, these policies are evolving toward more restrictive measures, including challenges to women’s higher education and reproductive rights.
A significant part of the discussion focuses on memory politics and historical revisionism, particularly the narrative of Hungary as a “double victim” of both Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. This framing obscures local responsibility and is accompanied by a broader geopolitical and cultural shift toward Eastern affiliations.The conversation further examines Hungary’s complex relationship with Russia, highlighting the tension between historical trauma and present-day political alliance, as well as the selective suppression of historical narratives that conflict with current geopolitical interests.
Ultimately, Hungary emerges as a model case of democratic erosion, whose mechanisms are increasingly observed—and in some cases replicated—by political movements worldwide. The episode concludes with reflections on the durability of such systems and the challenges of rebuilding democratic discourse in deeply polarized societies.
Guest: Andrea Pető – Professor of Gender Studies at Central European University (Vienna), research affiliate at the CEU Democracy Institute, and member of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. Her work on gender, illiberalism, and memory politics has been translated into over 25 languages.
Host: Michał Kozłowski – Philosopher, sociologist, and professor at the University of Warsaw, specializing in 17th-century philosophy, the history of the far right, and the social function of art.
Szukaj w treści odcinka
Partly because of the decreasing living standards and Hungary became the second poorest country in the European Union in the past 16 years as a result of this very conscious illiberal politics and partly because of the
So that's where we started, Hungary as a laboratory.
A Trojan horse which brings in mostly Russian policy measures into the European Union and from this European Union now it is accepted and implemented in the US on steroids because the transformation of US is like what happened in Hungary but on steroids.
From 1945 because of the massive rapes committed by the Red Army soldiers when they were liberating Hungary.
So in a sense they were passing a law, which is an export law, there's nothing to do with Hungary, which is impossible to implement and doesn't have an impact.
Hungary is also the first country which implemented the theory of great replacement as states ideology, which I think is particular because, well, among all the discourses of
This goes back to the 19th century, when there was this big debate about the origins of the Hungarians, but now it has a geopolitical shift, because the meeting of the Kurultaj, which is the meeting of all Turkish-speaking nomadic people, is often happening in Hungary, in the Great Pusta, in this land in the middle of the country.
Names mentioned, which also has another twist, namely that Hungary now is a very close ally of Putin's Russia, which just recently passed a law that those who are making critical comments on the Red Army might face six to twelve years of imprisonment.
We of course have 1848 and Hungary as a center of the spring of peoples and then Russian intervention against it and then we have 2056 Russian intervention.
I was looking, I was following it for years and it was anecdotical that everybody who visits Orbán's cabinet sees the map of the greater Hungary there, including Mr. Vucic, Serbian ultra-nationalist, including Croatians, Romanians and Slovakians.
So for me, who has been working on these rapes committed by the Red Army soldiers in the past 20 years, this shift is really, really interesting, because Hungary was occupied four times by the Russian-Soviet forces.
It would be needed some original ideas and maybe a discussion in which direction this new Hungary should be going.
Ostatnie odcinki
-
Beyond Ideology: Inside Hungary’s Illiberal Pra...
07.04.2026 16:00
-
Matka ze stali. Jak upadła Stocznia Gdyńska? I ...
30.03.2026 16:00
-
Czy elity w Polsce pogardzają Polakami? I Mikoł...
16.03.2026 16:00
-
Walka o nową Polskę. Stanisław Miłkowski i jego...
16.02.2026 17:00
-
Skrajna prawica: Żydzi, szczepionki i spiski? |...
11.02.2026 17:00
-
Konserwatyzm. Wyobrażone wartości czy spójna wi...
12.01.2026 17:00
-
"Jak rządzą nami cyberkorporacje?" | Sylwia Czu...
15.12.2025 17:00
-
Czy istniał narodowy komunizm? | Paweł Machcewicz
08.12.2025 16:58
-
Polacy i Żydzi w pierwszym nowoczesnym zrywie p...
17.11.2025 17:00
-
Gender. Bestia w lekarskim kitlu czy prawicowe ...
10.11.2025 17:00